Civilization #57: How Modernism Ruined Everything (Re-upload AUDIO FIXED -- Thanks to Gabriel Bessa)

Predictive History 1h3 7 min #71
Civilization #57: How Modernism Ruined Everything (Re-upload AUDIO FIXED -- Thanks to Gabriel Bessa)
Watch on YouTube

Summary

  • This episode traces the intellectual and cultural lineage from Western religious traditions through philosophy to Freudian psychoanalysis and modernism, arguing that the “cult of the self” was ultimately promoted by powerful interests to prevent collective action and maintain social control.

The religious and philosophical roots of individualism

  • Animism to polytheism: Early humans practiced animism, seeing themselves as interconnected with all living things in a cycle of birth and death. As societies became agricultural, the mother goddess rose in importance. With urbanization and warfare, polytheism emerged, where each city had its patron god and conquered peoples’ gods became servants of the victors’ gods, creating pantheons like those in Greek, Roman, and Norse mythology.
  • Monotheism as a radical break: The episode argues that Christianity was the first true monotheistic religion because of the Holy Trinity, the idea that God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit are separate but co-equal and unified. This concept implies God is both nothing and everything, excluding all other gods. For the first time, individuals had a direct connection to God, removing them from community mediation.
  • The Catholic Church as mediator: The church initially solved the individualism problem by mediating between people and God, creating its own community structure. This worked while the Roman Empire used monotheism to consolidate power.
  • The Protestant crisis of faith: Reformers like Martin Luther argued that individuals must access God directly through personal Bible reading, eliminating the need for church mediation. This created the “crisis of faith,” the problem of how to know whether you truly love God and whether God loves you, with doubt potentially condemning you to hell.
  • Three historical solutions to the crisis of faith:
    • Wealth accumulation (Calvinists): Making money proves your faith and God’s love for you, giving rise to capitalism.
    • Jihad: Dying for your faith demonstrates absolute devotion.
    • Transgression: Breaking social taboos and human morality proves your courage and faith in God. The episode illustrates this with a thought experiment where a teacher assigns students to shoplift, arguing that breaking taboos creates exhilaration and empowerment through demonstrated faith.

Philosophy’s attempt to resolve the crisis

  • Kant’s active subjectivity: We actively participate in reality by imposing space and time onto it, creating a world of appearance. However, Kant admitted we cannot truly know reality itself, raising the possibility that reality might not exist (like a computer simulation).
  • Hegel’s Geist (spirit/mind): Hegel resolved Kant’s problem by arguing that Geist is the manifestation of God underlying all reality, and that reality emerges from this spirit. Geist is in a process of reconciling itself with the world, moving toward universal enlightenment.
  • Marx’s inversion of Hegel: Marx put the material world before ideas, arguing that history moves through class struggle. As capitalism exploits the proletariat more and more, workers will develop class consciousness, unite, overthrow capitalists, and create an equal workers’ paradise.

Freud’s theory of the unconscious

  • Freud’s model of the individual: The individual is driven by unconscious forces: the ego (who we think we are), the superego (social forces acting on us), and the id (hidden sexual urges). These sexual urges are the true foundation of both individual identity and civilization.
  • The Oedipus and Electra complexes: Drawing on Greek mythology, Freud argued that men are driven by the Oedipus complex (unconscious desire for the mother and rivalry with the father) and women by the Electra complex (unconscious desire for the father and rivalry with the mother).
  • Freud versus his predecessors: While Kant, Hegel, and Marx build logically on each other with comprehensible frameworks, Freud’s theories appear strange and disconnected, raising the question of where he got these ideas.

Jung’s systematization and Freud’s rejection

  • Jung’s model: Carl Jung, Freud’s most prominent student, systematized Freud’s ideas into a more structured framework. The ego contains both conscious and unconscious elements, with the unconscious divided into personal (individual memories) and collective (society’s accumulated memories and experiences absorbed through daily life). We also have animus and anima (male and female duality), project different personas in different social contexts, and suppress our worst qualities into a “shadow.” Life becomes a process of self-discovery guided by psychotherapy.
  • Freud’s reaction: Rather than welcoming Jung’s improvements, Freud was infuriated, excommunicated Jung, and demanded that his entire circle sever ties with him. This raises the question of why Freud was so secretive and hostile to criticism.

Freud’s transformation: from advocate to mythmaker

  • Early Freud as advocate: In the late 19th century, Freud treated young women diagnosed with “hysteria” (inability to control emotions, fear of men, inability to form relationships). Through extended conversations, these women confided that their fathers had sexually abused them as children. Freud believed them, noting that different patients who didn’t know each other told consistent stories with the same details. In his 1896 paper “The Aetiology of Hysteria,” he argued that sexual abuse was far more common than society acknowledged, even among respected families, and that hysteria was a real trauma response, not imagined illness.
  • Jeffrey Mason’s discovery: Mason, a Harvard researcher trusted by Freud’s daughter Anna, studied Freud’s private letters and found that the early Freud and later Freud held fundamentally different theories of trauma.
  • The later Freud’s reversal: Freud completely changed his position, arguing that young girls are inherently sexual beings with unconscious sexual fantasies about their fathers. Innocent paternal affection and attempts to stop childhood masturbation supposedly create resentment and longing, making women unable to distinguish fantasy from reality. In his essay fragments, he claimed women were simply “love-hungry” and used illness to attract attention from caregiving males. In “Civilization and Its Discontents,” he expressed contempt for women, arguing they laid civilization’s foundations through love but are incapable of contributing to its advancement, which requires men’s superior intelligence and instinctual sublimation.

Why Freud changed his story

  • Economic pressure: Freud’s patients’ fathers were paying the bills. Telling a father he was responsible for his daughter’s trauma was not a sustainable business model.
  • The Semmelweis precedent: Ignaz Semmelweis, a Viennese doctor in the 1840s, discovered that handwashing with chlorine and lime solution virtually eliminated deadly childbed fever in maternity clinics. When he published his findings, the medical establishment blacklisted him because admitting the truth would mean accepting responsibility for previous deaths. He was confined to an asylum, beaten by guards, and died 14 days later. Freud, who had a young family, understood the consequences of defying powerful interests.
  • The interpretation of dreams as gaslighting tool: Freud needed a method to convince his patients that their abuse memories were actually fantasies. He pioneered dream analysis as a technique for subtly suggesting new ideas and implanting false memories, since patients would resist direct challenges to their conscious memories but were more suggestible when discussing dreams.

Evidence of widespread abuse in Vienna

  • Frankism and transgressive religion: Vienna in the late 19th century hosted secret societies and religious cults, including Frankism, which followed Sabbatai Zevi, a Jewish rabbi and self-proclaimed messiah in the Ottoman Empire. Zevi preached a religion of transgression, arguing that breaking moral boundaries demonstrated true faith. When given the choice between death and conversion to Islam, Zevi converted, telling followers that God cares about the heart, not actions. Frankism claimed perhaps 50,000 followers, including powerful people across Central and Eastern Europe, and engaged in sexually promiscuous rites. This context suggests that sexual abuse was indeed common in Vienna, supporting Freud’s original findings.

The spread of Freudian ideas through modernism

  • Modernism defined: Modernism is characterized as the “cult of the self,” a cultural movement obsessed with self-improvement, self-empowerment, and self-discovery that continues to the present day.
  • James Joyce and elitist literature: Joyce’s 1922 novel “Ulysses” is presented as the first great modernist work. Unlike Homer’s democratic epic poetry that brought beauty and truth to ordinary people, Joyce’s writing is elitist, self-referential, and deliberately obscure, filled with references requiring years of study to decode. The episode argues Joyce positioned himself as having “the mind of God,” accessible only to those willing to spend decades understanding his work.
  • Virginia Woolf and stream of consciousness: Woolf’s “To the Lighthouse” (1927) employs stream-of-consciousness writing influenced by Freud, attempting to capture how the mind actually works by blending reading, thinking, and daily life. Like Joyce, it is self-indulgent and inward-looking, a radical departure from traditional literature.
  • Dostoevsky versus modern literature: Dostoevsky’s approach holds that the human heart is a deep, impenetrable ocean, that we respond to external events and other people, and that salvation requires surrendering ourselves to others in community. Modern literature, by contrast, claims self-discovery enables self-mastery, that psychology responds to suppressed memories, and that we can be our own salvation, an outlook the episode characterizes as naively optimistic.
  • Picasso and visual representation of Jung: Picasso’s cubist painting “Head of a woman” visually represents Jung’s theory of the self, depicting what appears to be one person but is actually two, illustrating the duality of ego and shadow.

The political purpose of modernism

  • CIA and modern art: The episode cites a JSTOR academic article arguing that in the mid-20th century, modern art and design represented liberalism, individualism, dynamic activity, and creative risk possible in a free society. During the Cold War, when communism was spreading globally and calling for collective action, powerful interests in the capitalist West promoted Freud, Jung, Joyce, Woolf, Picasso, and modernist art to create a cult of self. If individuals believe they are the source of everything, they become incapable of collective action.
  • Mikhail Bakunin’s critique of individualism: Bakunin argued that freedom in isolation is an absurdity invented by theologians and metaphysicians. True freedom exists only in community, when surrounded by free people who recognize your individuality. Isolated freedom is actually slavery. Christianity, he argued, was a slave religion designed to make people slaves to themselves, preventing them from working with and loving others, which allows the powerful to better control them.

The present day: social media and the democratization of self-obsession

  • Social media as the democratization of the cult of self: Previously only the wealthy had the leisure for self-indulgence. Social media now allows everyone to participate in the cult of self, leading to a global epidemic of depression.
  • The 2015 inflection point: Data shows a sharp spike in depressive symptoms beginning in 2015, the year smartphones became widely accessible. Young people increasingly feel they can’t do anything right, that life is not useful, and that they don’t enjoy life. This has led to increased suicide rates not only in North America and Europe but also in Latin America and East Asia.
  • The solution: The episode concludes that the only way forward is to rediscover our humanity by finding the courage to care about others and put their interests before our own, deliberately killing the cult of self.
Back to Predictive History